Philosophy has been around for centuries. It has always resolved around the same fundamental issues. If you reflect on it, you realise philosophy has stayed fundamentally the same. A medieval philosopher like Ockam has done with the same kind of ‘ life’ or ‘ medium’ as a comtemporary philosopher. And I’m sure there has always been reflection on the use of philosophy. Philosophers have been around for a long time, is this a good thing? Since it has been such a long time, surely some great answer could be formulated to the question after reflection over so many years. This is the dream of meta-philosophy: ‘to settle the question once and for all’, at least to come with an answer that makes use of the history and experience of philosophers: is philosophy useful or not? Are philosophers significant contributors to society or not? A dream of me is that a solid answer is found to the question of the benefit of philosophy and philosophers.
Hello, I am philosophicalmouth and I want to express myself.
Shame for eros, shame for eros.
Today I had a philosophical conversation with a stranger. He asked me what kind of job I wanted to do later. I gave him my answer, but said I am not sure yet and that I hope I will find more out along the way. He asked me: ‘but won’t circumstances than decide what you will do?’. He further said the following. All kinds of factors could force you to do certain things. Maybe a lot of people are like that. Maybe a lot of people don’t do the things they really want to do. Giving thought to what he said, maybe that means we should set our minds to some goal the sooner the better. We should decide what we want to occupy ourselves before circumstances will decide for us. (And believe that in it.) (Oh and he had the feeling God exists, I kind of have such feeling to some extent as well. For example because he showed up.)
You don’t have to be so afraid that life will be not interesting enough or too boring:
all you need is:
doing the things you do with quality
the world will than provide novelty, adventure, otherness, the unexpected
so: from the inside: quality + from the outside: otherness
these will guarantee that life will be spicy.
I would like to add a quote from Bruce Lee. This is a quote that you can find on one of those posters. It’s useful because all these insights you know, you easily forget them and lose them out of mind. Solution: apply immediately and transform them into concrete change. Here it is:
“Knowing is not enough,
you must apply.
Willing is not enough,
you must do.”
Ps: I just saw on a website that it is also a quote by Goethe. Maybe Lee just took it from Goethe (he takes freely from all). Or maybe coincidentaly they thought of the same thing?
The greatest danger for the philosophical mind is: arrogance. Thinking it is enough to stay in your room and study all day or think all day. Not realising the walls are not instructive enough. Not realising above all that we need the world to shape and teach us. Not realising that that it is the enivronment rather than our ‘will’ which is most important for our development. Arrogance can make you overestimate your own beliefs, ideas and thinking capacities. ‘Maybe I am wrong’ is a thought that should always be kept in mind. Indeed, you could be completely wrong. Your ideas are only just that. I hope your experiences have shown you that. You should realise the trickiness of a situation in which you think you are right and the others are wrong. Arrogance can also lead you to not take interest in the contingencies of the world. ‘I don’t need to know that.’ ‘I don’t need to be able to do that.’ This is fundamental. Arrogance is a great danger for the philosophical mind.